Candidate cycle-20260526T020837Z-0…
DCDQTNWPCGGQQHCDKA
Why this candidate advanced
Advanced for computational review because it showed compact fold in the phenotype first unknown target campaign. This is a structural-prior signal only, not evidence of activity. The current computational decision is hold for review.
Next experimental question
Does this sequence show measurable phenotype first unknown target activity, target engagement, or useful stability under controlled assay conditions?
Structure
Structure Intelligence
Computational structural priors only. ESMFold/ESMFold2 predictions are not experimental structures or evidence of activity.
Research narrative
This is a computational prioritization result, not evidence of biological activity. Candidate struct_dd9ebccbcb6f52c0 (18 aa) was advanced by Protean's structure-intelligence rerank as a hold for review within the phenotype-first (unknown target) campaign.
Structural prior signals: compact fold. fold-confidence proxy 0.4408; compactness 0.8494; exposed-hydrophobic 0.3567.
Disulfide assessment: no feasible disulfide pattern detected.
Novelty: structural-novelty score 0.000; fold family fold_cluster_000 (family size 10). Nearest archived fold at structural distance 0.000.
Sequence brief
Triage label: neutral
compact_fold
Sequence and structure signals are computational triage evidence. They do not establish activity, binding, stability, safety, or wet-lab readiness.
Sequence & model analysis
No per-residue confidence available — a folded coordinate file has not been published for this candidate.
Provenance
computational structural prior; ESMFold/proxy prediction; not an experimental structure and not biological proof of fold, binding, stability, or activity
